Feminism is a Dirty Word

Feminism is a Dirty Word

Feminists are what’s wrong with the culture.

Feminists are why the Church has problems.

Feminists are why the morality of our society is in decline.

Feminists are toxic.

Not really. But if you’ve ever drifted anywhere near far-right circles, you’ve probably heard those words or something very close.

Feminism is a dirty word.

Feminists are angry women.

Feminists hate men and traditional gender roles.

Feminists are a product of the sexual revolution.

Feminists aren’t welcome here, thank you very much.

Maybe you’ve even heard of that dread subspecies of woman, the feminazi. She hates men and babies and is a perversion of all that is good and beautiful.

But what is feminism, really?

Feminism is the ever-radical idea that women are equal, and deserve to be treated as such, with men. It does not mean that men and women cannot have their unique differences, but at the end of the day, surprise! Women are people, too.

Catholicism is a religion that honors women by tradition, even if not all Catholics do so in practice. Mary the Mother of God is honored and respected across the world, given such titles as Queen of Heaven, Our Lady of the Sea, God-bearer, Queen of Patriarchs, Seat of Wisdom. Christ counted women among his disciples and his close friends. The angels first revealed that Christ had risen, not to his male disciples, but to his female disciples.

So why, why do so many Catholics embrace this attitude that tears down feminism? For that matter, why do non-Catholics embrace the attitude that Catholics can’t be feminists?

Why are we unwelcome? Where do we belong?

How can we fight for the dignity of women and victims of sexual assault when members of our faith are spurning feminism, or claiming that speaking up about abuse makes you a “radical toxic feminist,” and calling for the deaths of these so-called “feminist sinners”? How can you fight for the dignity of women when you believe their only place in life is to be meek, forgiving, humble wives and mothers and nothing more?

Was Mary being meek when she told Jesus to turn the water into wine at Cana? What of Mary, sister of Martha, when she refused to help her sister with the chores in order to listen to Jesus teaching? Did Mary Magdalene show meekness when she faced down the disapproval of Judas and other disciples to anoint Jesus’s feet with perfume and wash them with her hair? Were the female disciples being meek when they remained at the foot of the Cross after (almost) all the men had fled in fear? These women spoke up for what was right, they flaunted what was “conventional” and “acceptable” behavior for their time and culture, and Jesus praised them for it. These women, along with their Old Testament sisters (Esther, Judith, Deborah, Rahab, to name a few), are pillars of female activism and strength.

Artemisia Gentileschi, Judith Beheading Holofernes, 1611-1612, Museo di Capodimonte, Naples

Was Joan of Arc being a meek and humble woman when she put on armor and led French troops into battle? What about Hildegard of Bingen when she wrote a controversial medical text about treating women? Did Catherine of Siena respect male authority when she chastised the Pope at Avignon for abandoning his flock? Was Dorothy Day meek and humble in her fight for social justice? And yet these women are honored by the Church for what was, at the time, their somewhat unwomanly and definitely unconventional vocations.

This does not mean that there is something wrong with a woman choosing meekness, submissiveness, or humility. Marriage and motherhood are incredible and worthy vocations, but being a wife and a mother is not where a woman begins and ends. She is so much more — like all the holy women and saints who came before.

Fight for feminism.

Fight for women. Fight for Catholics to return to true teachings of the Catechism, because nowhere in the Baltimore Catechism did it ever say “go after people who are different than you with guns and knives and seething insults” combined with a black and red illustration of little Timmy glaring out his window at the kids outside.

“Love one another.”

It’s not easy to do, but it is easy to misinterpret.


2 Responses

  1. Ginnie Pride says:

    As a victim of sexual assault, I despise the word and movement itself because since the beginning, feminism has had anti-Catholic, racist, and other problematic traits. Mainstream feminism in its various waves have done some form of harm to women and I reject the term in replacement of “women’s welfare advocacy”. After all, feminism does not have a monopoly on fighting for the dignity of women, and I refuse to let people push the feminist label on me.

    I think if more people stop slapping the feminist label onto anything remotely pro-woman, you would see a lot more openness to improving things for women. A lot of people react negativly to the word for a reason, and its not because they hate women — but by insinuating that helping women in any form is “feminist”, you are alienating those who, like me, are aware of the toxicity of the movement who also wish to better things for women. I and others don’t want nor need to be associated with a movement that has caused so much harm.

    Obviously there are issues with people belittling women’s welfare in general — but trying to push a tired and broken system onto the subject makes things worse.

  2. Kurgan says:

    Only the italicized portions are true. The rest is whinging. We, men and women, are in this (life) together whether you like it or not. Driving this petulant wedge between us is colossally counterproductive. Reality does not care about how special you wish you were. The vast majority of men are neither predators nor enemies. We are not required to change so that you feel safe everywhere at all times. Nobody is entitled to that. Grow up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe now to our newsletter: